<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Language Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-9289</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Persian modal verbs and the expression of modality</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Persian modal verbs and the expression of modality</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>21</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>40</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">35922</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jolr.2013.35922</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Jalal</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahimian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Shiraz</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amouzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Isfahan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Modal verbs and their different meanings can be investigated on the basis of various theoretical frameworks. In this paper, Persian modal verbs are examined and analyzed in terms of degrees and kinds of modality proposed by Palmer (1990). Our analysis shows that although &lt;em&gt;bǎyad &lt;/em&gt;‘must’ does not entail the proposition, it is used to express three degrees of epistemic modality, two degrees of dynamic modality and a degree of deontic modality. &lt;em&gt;tavǎnestan&lt;/em&gt; ‘can’ and &lt;em&gt;šodan&lt;/em&gt; ‘to become’, on the other hand, behave rather differently; they are used in expressing two degrees of epistemic modality, two degrees of deontic modality and a degree of dynamic modality. According to this research, Persian modals have the capacity to express all degrees and kinds of modality proposed by Palmer.
  
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Modal verbs and their different meanings can be investigated on the basis of various theoretical frameworks. In this paper, Persian modal verbs are examined and analyzed in terms of degrees and kinds of modality proposed by Palmer (1990). Our analysis shows that although &lt;em&gt;bǎyad &lt;/em&gt;‘must’ does not entail the proposition, it is used to express three degrees of epistemic modality, two degrees of dynamic modality and a degree of deontic modality. &lt;em&gt;tavǎnestan&lt;/em&gt; ‘can’ and &lt;em&gt;šodan&lt;/em&gt; ‘to become’, on the other hand, behave rather differently; they are used in expressing two degrees of epistemic modality, two degrees of deontic modality and a degree of dynamic modality. According to this research, Persian modals have the capacity to express all degrees and kinds of modality proposed by Palmer.
  
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Modal Verbs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">degree and kind of modality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">epistemic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">deontic and dynamic modalities</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jolr.ut.ac.ir/article_35922_6ff4bf36c3cc15f967e403aa0f85f0cd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
