Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Ph.D. Student of General Linguistics Terhan University

Abstract

Auxiliation is a subfield of the more familiar field of grammaticalization in world languages and deals with the way in which complex lexical verb structures develop over time into auxiliary grammatical structures in some of their usages. Most auxiliaries in New Persian were used just as lexical verbs in Old or Middle Persian and converted into auxiliaries through grammaticalization. The present study deals with the process of auxiliation of "shodan" in passive structure in Persian. This paper by providing instances of the passive structures in Old and Middle Persian provides an answer to the question of whether the usage of "shodan" as an auxiliary in passive structure goes back to the Old Persian or has been the outcome of grammaticalization. According to the existing evidences, the grammatical function of "shodan" in New Persian has been acquired through auxiliation during Dari (early New Persian) in the process of the evolution of passive structure from stative passive in Old and Middle Persian to dynamic passive in Dari. From typological view point, comparing the evolution of passive structure in Persian with similar processes in some other languages makes it clear that such an evolution has been due to a common tendency in languages towards dynamic passive in order to disambiguate passive structures.

Keywords

منابع
ابوالقاسمی، محسن (1375). دستور تاریخی زبان فارسی، تهران، سمت.
                         (1373). ماده­های فعل‌های فارسی دری، تهران، قفنوس. 
برونر، کریستوفر جی (1376). نحو زبان‌های ایرانی میانه غربی، ترجمۀ سعید عریان، تهران، حوزه هنری.
دبیرمقدم، محمد (1384). مجهول در زبان فارسی، علی اکبر رژدام (ویراستار)،  پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناختی فارسی (1-17). تهران، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
راستارگویوا، وراسرگی یونا (1347). دستور زبان فارسی میانه، ترجمۀ ولی­الله شادان. تهران، بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
فرشیدورد، خسرو (1382). دستور مفصل امروز، تهران، سخن.
Bybee, J. 2003.  Cognitive processes in grammaticalization, In M. Tomasello (ed.),  The New Psychology of Language, Vol. II. (145-167) ,  New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Bybee, J, R. Perkins and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar : Tense, Aspect,  and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. 
Giger, M. 2012. The recipient passive in West Slavic: A calque from German and its grammaticalization, In W. Björn, W. Bernhard and H. Björn (eds). Grammatical      Replication and Borrowability in Language Contact.( 559-588) , Berlin-New York.
Givón, T. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: Anarcheologist’s field trip, CLS .7. 394-415. 
Heine, B.  1993.  Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization, Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Heine, B. and T. Kuteva, 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Cambridge University Press.
 
Hopper, P. J.  1991. On some principles of grammaticalization, In E. Closs Traugott and  B. Heine (eds.).  Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol.1. 17-36, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P. J. and  E. Closs Traugott , 2003. Grammaticalization , 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kent, R. G.  1953. Old Persian Grammar,  New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society.
Kuteva, T. 2001. Auxiliation: An  enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
Lehmann, C. 2002. Thoughts on grammaticalization , 2nd ed. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.
Wischer, I. 2011. Aspects of Grammaticalization: Current Resources and  Future Prospects,  Hiroshima Studies in English Language and Literature, 55. 1-17.
 
وبگاه­های اینترنتی
نرم افزار دیوان بزرگان (2012). مؤسسۀ فرهنگی جهان نما.
                                                                           www.JAHANNAMAA8.COM
Molnárfi, László. Multiple paths of grammaticalization: The case of get in English,kry in Afrikaans and kriegen in German,
 http://www.rug.nl/research/clcg/about-the-institute/events/ colloquia/2009-2010/abstractgroningen-molnarfi.