The Effect of the Number of Vowels on the Size of Vowel Spaces: Adaptive Dispersion Theory's Key Prediction

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor of Linguistics Department, Esfahan University

Abstract

In this paper, the validity of the key prediction of Adaptive Dispersion Theory was tested. According to this prediction, vowels of a given language are organized in such a way that they are sufficiently distinct on the perceptual level. It implies that more crowded inventories, which also have wider F1 dimension, occupy greater vowel spaces than inventories with fewer vowels.  To investigate this hypothesis, the size of Persian vowel space with 6 peripheral vowels was compared with that of Fereydounkenari variety of Mazandarani dialect with 5 peripheral vowels, using the methodology introduced by Padgett and Tabain (2005) and three size indices proposed by Becker-Krystal (2010). Through rigorous statistical analysis, the sizes of vowel spaces were found to be positively correlated with the number of vowels in the inventory; that is, Persian has clearly greater vowel spaces in all groups, i.e., male and female stressed and unstressed contexts, than Mazandarani, but the number of peripheral vowels did not affect the F1 dimension. For an in-depth analysis, the three area indices were also calculated for back and front subspaces in those groups. The results indicated that only Persian male and female unstressed groups in back subspaces have greater F1span than Mazandarani dialect. With few exceptions, then, the prediction of Adaptive Dispersion Theory was validated.

Keywords


اسفندیاری، نسیم (1393). بررسی صوت‌شناختی فضای واکه‌ای در زبان فارسی و تحلیل آن در چارچوب نظریه پراکندگی سازگاریافته. پایان نامه دکتری زبانشناسی دانشگاه اصفهان.      
     
بی‌جن‌خان، محمود (1392). نظام آوایی زبان فارسی. تهران: سمت.
قرائتی، سپیده (1389). بررسی صوت‌شناختی تکیه واژگانی در زبان فارسی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه اصفهان.
علی‌نژاد، بتول و فهیمه حسینی‌بالام (1391). مبانی آواشناسی آکوستیکی. اصفهان: انتشارات دانشگاه اصفهان.
علی‌نژاد، بتول (1391). فضای واکه‌ای در زبان فارسی. پژوهشنامه زبان‌شناختی زبان فارسی، شماره دوم، سال اول، 45-53. 
کرد زعفرانلو کامبوزیا، عالیه (1385). واجشناسی: رویکرد قاعده‌بنیاد. تهران: سمت.
مدرسی قوامی، گلناز (1392). تأثیر تکیه واژگانی بر ویژگی‌های کیفی واکه‌های ساده زبان فارسی. علم زبان، سال 1، شماره 1، 41-56.
محمدی، هیوا و همکاران (1392). تعیین ساختار سازه‌ای و فضای واکه‌ای در واکه‌های زبان فارسی. دو ماهنامه شنوایی‌سنجی، دوره 20 شماره 2، 79-85.
 
Alexander, J. A. 2010. The theory of adaptive dispersion and acoustic-phonetic properties of cross-language lexical-tone systems, Ph.D dissetation in linguistics, University of Evanston, Illinois.
Ansaian, A. k. 2004. An acoustic analysis of modern Persian vowels. Russia: 9th conference  on Speech and computer, 20-22.
Becker-Kristal, R. 2010. Acoustic typology of vowel inventories and Dispersion theory: insights from a large cross-linguistic corpus. Ph.D dissetation in linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
Bradlow, A. 1995. Comparative study of English and Spanish vowels. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 97: 1916-1924.
Harrington, J. 2010. Phonetic analysis of Speech Corpora. London: Wiley-Blackwell publication.
Lindblom, B. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In J. Ohala,  and J., Jaeger, (eds.) Experimental phonology ( 13-44)Orlando: Academic Press.    
Liljencrants, J. & B. Lindblom. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language 48: 839-862.        
Livijn, P. 2000. Acoustic distribution of vowels in differently sized inventories – hot spots or adaptive dispersion? PERILUS, 23: 93-96.
Mahalanobis, P. C. 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India 2(1): 49-55.
Miller, J. D. 1989. Auditiry –perceptual interpretation of the vowels. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 88: 2114-2134.
Padgett, J & M. Tabain. 2005. Adaptive dispersion theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica 62: 14-54.
Peterson,  G. E. and H. L. Barney.  1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels, Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 24: 175-184.
Price, P. 2002. The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation. Boston: Boston University.
Rokne, J. 1996. The area of a simple polygon, J. Arvo, (1996) Graphics GemsII. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stevens, K.N. 1972. The quantal nature of speech: evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In   P. B. Denes and E. E. Davids (eds), Human communication, A Unified View (51-66), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stevens, K.N. 1998. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Volume 7, Issue 1
September 2016
Pages 97-115
  • Receive Date: 17 December 2015
  • Revise Date: 22 December 2015
  • Accept Date: 05 March 2016
  • First Publish Date: 21 May 2016