Language Research

Language Research

Processing Null and Overt Pronouns in Persian

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
hamideh marefat 1
Eskandar Samadi 2
1 Professor of Applied Linguistics, University of Tehran
2 Ph.D. Candidate in Applied Linguistics, Kharazmi University
10.22059/jolr.2016.61527
Abstract
‌‌‌This study examined the processing of null and overt pronouns by Persian speaking monolinguals. Different theories have been suggested for the interpretation of these pronouns. The “Position of Antecedent” hypothesis predicts that the processor prefers the antecedent in the IP position for the null pronoun; however, the antecedent in the lower positions in the structure is preferred for the overt pronouns. The other theory, “Recency Principle”, predicts that the processor attempts to find the reference for the pronoun as immediately as possible; thus, the parser will select the very first antecedent which matches the pronoun. To examine Persian speaking monolinguals’ processing of these pronouns, 18 sentences including a matrix and a subordinate clause which included an overt or a null pronoun were developed. The overt or the null pronouns either preceded or followed the antecedent or were located between the two antecedents. The participants read each sentence which appeared on the monitor accompanied by three pictures each of which represented a different interpretation of the pronoun. The results showed that, irrespective of the position of the subordinate clause and the type of pronoun, the predictions of the “Position of Antecedent” hypothesis are true unless the sentence has a marked structure.
Keywords
Overt and null pronouns
Backward anaphora
Forward anaphora
Position of Antecedent Hypothesis
Recency Principle
Persian native speakers
درزی، علی (1384). «شیوه استدلال نحوی»، تهران، سمت.
سجودی، فرزان و صادقی، لیلا (1389). «کارکرد گفتمانی سکوت در ساخت‌مندی روایت داستان کوتاه»، فصلنامۀ پژوهشهای زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی . د 1. ش 2. 69-88.
غلامحسین زاده، غلامحسین و نوروزی، حامد (1387).  «نقش ارجاع شخصی و اشاره‌ای در انسجام شعر عروضی فارسی»، پژوهشهای ادبی.د 5. ش 19. صص 117-138.
 
Almor, A. 1999. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106 (4), 748-765.
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernandez-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C.
2002. Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Rivista di
Linguistica (Italian Journal of Linguistics), 14 (2), 151–170.
Ariel, M. 1991. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar.
Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 443–463.
Carminati, Maria Nella 2002. The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns . Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Cowart, W. & Cairns, H. S. 1987. Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing. Some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints. Memory and Cognition 15, 318–31.
Kazanina, N. 2005. The acquisition and processing of backward anaphora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Kweon, S. O. 2011. Processing null and overt pronoun subject in ambiguous sentences in Korean. International Journal of Linguistics, 3, 1-13.
Rizzi, L. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 3, 501–557.
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of
Italian. Second Language Research, 22 (3), 339–368.
Van Gompel, R. G. P. & Majid, A. 2004. Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns. Cognition, 90, 255-264.
Language Research
Volume 7, Issue 2
January 2017
Pages 97-115

  • Receive Date 23 May 2016
  • Revise Date 21 June 2016
  • Accept Date 21 November 2016