Document Type : Research Paper


1 M.A. Student, Department of Linguistics, Chabahar Maritime University

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Chabahar Maritime University


This research, conducted in the field of pragmatics and sociolinguistics, aims at the describing and analyzing the type and number of request strategies in Kurdish, Mokri dialect, regarding the effectiveness or non-effectiveness of social factors as the gender of user and the power of addressee. To this end, for data collection, a revised version of Discourse Completion Test (DCT) including 12 situations was distributed among 130 (65 males and 65 females) Mokri Kurdish speakers in Mahabad city located in the southern of West Azabayejan province. They were in the age range of 25 to 35, holding at least a bachelor degree. Besides the questionaire, direct observation consisting of 7 hours of everyday normal conversations in various situations and different contexts was employed to collect more natural and reliable data. As the main theoretical framework for the present study, Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) coding scheme used by Blum-Kulka, House and Kasper (1989) was employed and Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory was used as the peripheral framework. Results of the research showed a significant difference across genders in selection of the type of request strategis and the power of addressee had a significant effect on choosing the strategies. It was also shown that power and gender had an interactive effect on the selection of these strategies. According to supporting strategies of the "negative and positive faces" in Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory, it was found that Kurdish people as the members of one cooperative group mostly employed positive face saving acts in their communications and interactions. The research findings indicate that it is about time for linguists as educational planners to consider these sociolinguistic differences in teaching Kurdish language to non-Kurdish people in order to prevent any probable mishaps in their communications and interactions with Kurdish speakers.


Alasti, S. 1391. The relation of education, gender & age with request and request response in Persian, M. A. Thesis, Tehran, Department of General Linguistics, Payame Noor University[In Persian].
Amel Mousavi, B.1368. Politeness Speech and Gender in Farsi of Tehran, M. A. Thesis, Tehran, Department of General Linguistics, University of Tehran. [In Persian].
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words, Oxford, Oxford University Press
Blum-Kulka, S., and Olshtain, E. 1984. Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP), Applied Linguistics, 5(3): 196-213
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., and Kasper, G. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Norwood, NJ, Alblex Publishing Corporation
Brown, G., and Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Crystal, D. 1985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Oxford, Blackwell.
Cutting, J. 2008. Pragmatics and Discourse, London and New York, Rutledge.
Dong, X. 2009. Requests in Academic Setting in English, Russian, and Chinese, Doctoral dissertation, university of Ohio: USA
Ervin‐Tripp, S. 1964. An Analysis of the Interaction of Language, Topic, and Listener, American Anthropologist, 66(6): 86-102
Eslami rasekh, Z. 1993. A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Requestive Speech Act Realization Patterns in Persian and American English, Pragmatic and Language Learning, 4: 85-103
Ghiasian M. S., & Eslami, R., & Zohreh, V., & Amirreza, and Sedaghat, E. 1392. Requesting Strategies: A Comparative Study among Persian Speakers and Foreign Persian Learners, Journal of Persian Language Teaching to Non-Persian, 2(2), 3-30. [In Persian].
Hedayt, N. 1384. The effect of gender on request: a research on sociolinguistics, Research in Persian Language and Literature, 4, 17-40. [In Persian].
Khodaei, M & Massoumeh, E., Mahmoud, and Sharifi, Shahla.1396.. Describing and analysing of some polite words in Persian based on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory, Alzahra University Quarterly Journal of Language Research (Zabanpazhuhi), 9(22), 25-53. [In Persian].
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Searle, J. R. 1975. Indirect Speech Acts, Syntax and Semantics, 3: 59-82
Sills, D. L. 1991. International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 19: 250-252
Uso-Juan, E., and Martinez Flor, A. 2008. Teaching learners to appropriately mitigate requests, ELT Journal, 62(4): 349-357
Vivien, B. 2004. Gender and Psychology, London, Routledge
Watts, R. J. 2003. Politeness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics, Oxford, Oxford University Press
ــــــــــــــــ. 1996. The study of language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Zeynali, S.1390. The Study of the Effect of Addressee's Power and Gender on the Type and Number of Apology and Refusal Strategies Employed by Sarawani University Students, M. A. Thesis, Zahedan, Department of General Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan. [In Persian].