Derivational Prefixes Ordering

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Linguistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Linguistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Affix ordering is a theoretical discussion in morphology. There has been some debate over the existence of general principles or mechanisms governing affix ordering. In this regard, we can point to three principal approaches. The first approach named the stratum-oriented model (Siegel, 1974; Allen, 1978; Kiparsky, 1982; Mohanan, 1986), believes that lexicon has a layered structure and can determine the affixes' combinations. The second approach relies on Selectional Restrictions' affix oriented (Fabb, 1988; Plag, 1999). These restrictions include restrictions of the group of affixes and phonological, morphological, semantic, and syntax restrictions. This approach claims that the description of possible and impossible combinations of affixes is related to describing the functions of restrictions. The third approach formed the theoretical framework of the present study by providing a psycho-linguistic model based on this idea that the affix ordering is a function of the degree of parsability of affixes from their bases (Hay 2000; 2002). According to this approach, affixes parsed easily in language processing cannot stay near the base relative to the affixes with a lower degree of parsability. Plag (2003) called the approach as Complexity-Based Ordering (CBO). The question is that how can we describe the Persian derivational prefixes ordering based on the CBO framework. For this reason, by selecting 17 prefixes 2200 derivational words extracted from database. By considering prefixes co-occurrences the rank of each prefix was obtained by using directed-graph and upper triangle square matrixes. According to this theoretical framework, by using frequency of derivational words and bases we could draw the scatter plot and determined the rank of type and token frequency ratio. Finally, according to data and by using the rank of parsability, type and token frequency ratio, we assessed the continuum of Persian prefixes ordering. Similar to Hay and Plag (2004) findings, this approach can describe Persian prefixes ordering as well as English affixes ordering

Keywords

References

Allen, M. 1978. Morphological investigations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Conneticut.  
Baayen, R. H. 1992. Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity, In Booij G. & J. Van Marle, Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 49-109.
ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ. 2002. Word Frequency Distribution, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fabb, N. 1988. English Suffixation is Constrained only by Selectional Restrictions, Natural Language and linguistic Theory 6, 527-539.
Gholamali Zade, Kh. & Feizi Pirani, Y. 2011. Lexical Stratum and Layers in Persian Affixes Based on Lexical Morphology. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 65-84. [In Persian].
Giegerich, H. J. 1999. Lexical Strata in English. Morphological causes, Phonological Effects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, J. 2000. Causes and Consequences of Word Structure, Ph.D. dissertation. Northwestern University.
ــــــــــــــــــــ. 2002. From Speech Perception to Morphology: Affix-ordering Revisited, Language 78.3, 527-555.
Hay, J. & Baayen, H. 2002. Parsing and Productivity. Yearbook of Morphology, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 203- 255.
Hay, J. & Plag, I. 2004. What Constraints Possible Suffix Combinations? On the Interaction of Grammatical and Processing Restrictions in Derivational Morphology, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, 565-596.
Hemasian, M. 2010. The Survey of Persian Derivational Affixes. MA. Thesis, University of Isfahan. [In Persian].
Kalbasi, I. 2001. The Derivational structure of Word in Modern Persian. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].
Keshani, Kh. 1992. Suffix Derivation in Modern Persian. Tehran: Iran University Press. [In Persian].
Kiparsky, P. 1982a. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology, in van der Hulst and Smith, 1982a.
ــــــــــــــــــــــــ. 1982b. Lexical Phonology & Morphology, Seoul: Linguistics in the Morning Calm.
Mohanan, K.P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Plag, I. 1996. Selectional Restriction in English Suffixation revisited: A Reply to Fabb 1988, Linguistics, 34, 769-798.
ــــــــــــــ. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
ـــــــــــــــ. 2002. The Role of Selectional Restrictions, Phonotactics and Parsing in Constraining Suffix Ordering in English, in Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Foris, Dordrecht, 285–314.
ــــــــــــــــ. 2003. Word–formation in English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ــــــــــــــ. 2004. Syntactic Category Information and the semantics of Derivational Morphological Rules, folia Linguistica 38, 193-225.
Selkirk, E. 1982. The Syntax of Words, Cambridge: MIT Press.
 Siegel, D. 1974. Topics in English Morphology, Cambridge: MIT Pr
Language Research
Volume 12, Issue 1
July 2021
Pages 71-96

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 October 2018
  • Revise Date: 23 January 2019
  • Accept Date: 05 September 2020
  • First Publish Date: 23 August 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics