Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Linguistics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor Linguistics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The present research is aimed to analyses the morphological typology of Persian on the basis of the framework of Distributed Morphology (DM). According to the findings of DM, the predominant tendency of Persian's morphological type is defined here on a two-dimensional chart; a chart provided by Aikhenvald (2007) from the conjugation typology of languages, which itself was defined on the basis of the criteria proposed by Sapir. The horizontal axis in this diagram deals with the degree of internal complexity of words and its horizontal axis includes the transparency of morphological boundaries between the morphemes within a grammatical word. Accordingly, the main research questions are to determine: the position of Persian language on the basis of “degree of internal complexity of words”, as well as, its typology on the basis of “border transparency criteria”. To analyses the grammatical structures of Persian, a variety of diverse structures, among different Persian text types, including stories, textbooks, scenarios, and research papers was gathered, which contained a total number of nine thousand and six hundred words. The investigation on the first question on the basis of Greenberg’s quantitative standards illustrates that, by achieving a number of one thousand and five hundred and six words from the above-mentioned index, the orientation of today’s Persian language, according to the “degree of internal complexity of words” or what is called as “word combinability criteria”, is towards “analytic” language type. Considering the second question, the research demonstrates that in view of the “border transparency criteria” for morphemes which indicates ways to connect morphemes, Persian language is more inclined towards “agglutinating” language type. Finally, it can be concluded that based on the findings of DM, the dominant tendency of morphosyntactic structures of Persian is towards “agglutinating-analytic” languages. Therefore, the research findings in considering Persian within the DM framework approves its grouping within agglutinating-analytic language types, though in comparison to the previous studies, the reduction of the statistical results here illustrates the main tendency of Persian's morphological type towards analytic languages and its movement towards becoming more analytic.

Keywords

Aikhenvald, A.Y., 2007. Typological Distinctions in Word-Formation. In Language Typology and Syntatic Description Vol III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (Ed.), 2nd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p 1-65.
Al-e-Ahmad, J.,1966. Headmaster (modir-e madrese), sazman-e ketabha-ye parastu, Third Edition.[In Persian].
Anushe, Mazdak, (in press). Morphology in Syntax: From Minimalist Program to Distributed Morphology, Tehran: University of Tehran.[In Persian].
Anushe, M., 2018. “A Revision of Persian Past Tense Inflection a Distributed Morphology Approach”, Language Related Research, volume 9, issue 1. P. 57-80.[In Persian].
Bayzai, B., 2001. Killing Mad Dogs (Sagkoshi), Roshangaran and Women Studies publication, First Edition.[In Persian].
Bloomfield, L.,1933. Language, New York: Henry Holt.
Chomsky, N., 1995. The Minimalist program, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Comrie, B.,2001. Different Views of Language Typology. In M. Haspelmath, E. Konig, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals (pp. 25-39). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Dabir Moghaddam, M., 2013. Typology of Iranian Languages, Volume 1, Tehran: SAMT, First Edition.[In Persian].
Dolat Abadi, M., 1990. Time spent on older people; Book I: (climate, wind), Tehran: Cheshmeh Publishing, First Edition.[In Persian].
Ebtekar Newspaper, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Educational Research and Planning Organization, 2019. History 3: Iran and the contemporary world, Twelfth grade, Secondary high school, Field of Humanities, Iran Textbook Publishing Company, second edition.[In Persian].
Educational Research and Planning Organization,2017. Biology 1, tenth grade, Secondary high school, Field of Experimental Sciences, Iran Textbook Publishing Company, second edition.[In Persian].
Embick, D., 2015. The Morpheme, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fars News Agency, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Greenberg, J.H.,1954. “A Quantitative Approach to the morphological Typology of Language”, in Spencer, R. (Ed), Method and Perspective in Anthropology, Minneapolis.
Greenberg, J.H.,1974. Language Typology: A Historical and Analytic Overview. The Hague, Paris: Mounton.
Halle, M. & A. Marantz.,1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds). The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honour of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p111–176.
Hamdeli Newspaper, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Hedayat, S., 1942. The Stray Dog (Sag-e velgard): Darkroom (tarikkhane), Tehran: Amir Kabir, Fifth Edition.[In Persian].
Hockett, Ch. ,1958. Two models of grammatical description. In: M. Joos (Ed). Readings in linguistics [2nd Ed], Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p386-399.
Humboldt, W. v.,1825. Über das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen, und ihren Einfluss auf die Ideeentwiccklung. Abhandlungen der hist. phil. Klasse, Berlin: königliche Akademi der Wissenschaften, 401-30.
Humboldt, W. v.,1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaus (Vol. I of Über die Kawispache auf der Insel Java). Berlin: königliche Akademi der Wissenschaften.
Javan Newspaper, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Jomhouri-e Eslam Newspaper, 1 September 2019. [In Persian].
Kayhan Newspaper, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Khorasan Newspaper, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Marantz, A., 1997. No Escape from Syntax; Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. In: A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark, and A. Williams (Eds). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 201-225.
Mardomsalari Newspaper, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Mehr News Agency, 1 September 2019. [In Persian].
Nida, E.,1949. Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words,Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Nida, E.,1965. Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words [2nd Ed], Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (First published 1949).
Noyer, R.,1997. Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure, NY: Garland.
Persian Linguistic Database (PLDB), Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.[In Persian].
PerspolisNews Agency, 29 August 2019. [In Persian].
Rezaei, vali. Bahrami, F., 2015. Fundamentals of Linguistic typology, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, First Edition.[In Persian].
Samareh, Y., 1990. “An analysis of the typology of language: typology features of Persian language”, Iranian journal of linguistics, volume 7, issue 1. P. 61-80. [In Persian].
Sapir, E., 1921. Language, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Schlegel, A.W.v.,1818. Observations sur la langue et la littérature provinçales. Parise.
Schlegel, K. W. F. v., 1808. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Heidelberg: Mohr and Zimmer.
Sharifi, Shahla. Akhlaghi, e., 2013.  “A study of the Morphology of Persian Language Today Based on a Quantitative Approach to Typology”, The 8th International Conference of the Association for the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature of Iran, University of Zanjan. [In Persian].
Shopen, T., 2007, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume 3: Complex Constructions (2nd Edition), Cambridge University Press.
Siddiqi, D.,2009. Syntax within the Word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Tasnim News Agency, 1 September 2019.[In Persian].
Thompson, L. C.,1987. A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.