Document Type : Research Paper


1 M.A. Student of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.


Based on Foucault's discourse analysis approach, this study examines participants' discourse perceptions of historical-political words and tries to find the answer to the question of how different historical-discourse formulations and their changing nature is expressed in words as a referent of discourse truth (constructed discourse) and reproduced and  recalled by words. In other words, how is the "word" itself a discourse that can be analyzed? This research was conducted in two stages and two questionnaires with 110 and 135 participants. The method of this research is qualitative-quantitative and based on description and analysis. The second questionnaire in 5 groups of questions evaluates the connection of the word with historical periods and discourses, the difference between the discourse of the word in each period, and the individual discourse of the participants. The data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively in the form of statistics and graphs. Quantitative analysis of data from 21 items by SPSS software confirmed a significant relationship between "words" and "historical periods and discourses". The results showed that some words, such as historical-political words, are to some extent formed in discourse and are tied to specific historical discourses. And reciprocally,  independently and disregarding any background and verbal context, they can represent and induce that discourse and reconstruct the components related to that discourse in the mind of the addressee. Thus, although the words have their own lexical meaning in the language, according to different contexts, conditions of occurrence, different minds, and finally different discourses, they show different perceptions, influences, and relative meanings and carry different discourses, and the concept  they have in the mind is a historical  one that has been formed in history. This study concludes that words reflect the reorientation of the discourse formulations and articulations of history and they alone can be studied in discourse analysis and ethnology.


Main Subjects

Abdollah Yova, A. 2016. A Contrastive Analysis of Political and Social Expressions in Persian and Kazakh Journalistic Prose. MA thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University.]In Persian.[
Bashiriyeh.H.1999.New Theories in Political Science.Tehran: Novin Press.]In Persian.[

Bostanee,Gh  And et al.2019. Investigating the Changes in the Term of Shiite with Historical Perspective. Research in Shi’a Comparative Theology, 1(1): 99-126.]In Persian.[

Canihac, H.  2020. From nostalgia to utopia: A genealogy of French conceptions of supranationality (1848-1948). Modern Intellectual History, 17(3), pp 707-736.

Daigle, H. 2019. Words Really Can Hurt You: The Potential Impacts of Political Rhetoric on Secondary School Students in the San Diego-Tijuana Border Region. MA thesis. University of California San Diego.

Dreyfus, H.L & Rabinow,P.2000. Michel foucault beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Translated by Bashiriyeh.H. Tehran: Ney Press. ]In Persian.[

Dunin-Wąsowicz, R. 2015. Culture for Europe: struggles for contemporary meanings and social understandings of Europe through cultural institutions, festivals, and art projects. PhD Dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). in:  http://etheses. lse. ac. uk/3223/1/Dunin-W%C4%85sowicz_culture_for_europe. pdf.

Fairclough, N. 1993. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Farajolahi.M.2019. The refletion of nationalizing The oil industry in The editorials of Bakhar Emrooz newspaper, MA thesis, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University. ]In Persian.[
Foucault, M. 1971. Orders of Discourse. Social Science Information. 10 (2), pp. 7-30.
Foucault, M. 1977. The political function of the intellectual. Translated by Armen Lyuk’s, Tehran: Cultural Keyhan, 6(20): 21-23. ]In Persian.[
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-1977. (ed by) C Gordon. New York: Pantheon.

Foucault, M.2003. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. in: From Modernism to Postmodernism, Cahoone,L.E (Editor). Translated by Abdul Karim Rashidian and others. Tehran: Ney Publishing. ]In Persian.[

Foucault, M.2010. Nietzsche, Freud, Marx. Translated by Jahanideh, A. And et al, Tehran, Hermes Publications. ]In Persian.[
Foucault, M.2011. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Translated by Emami, Y. Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies Publications. ]In Persian.[
Gruner, S. M. 1967. Bourgeois and bourgeoisie from 1789 – 1844: a study in the evolution of French political theory. MA thesis, Durham University. in: http://etheses. dur. ac. uk/9616/.

Guo, T.  2020. Politics of love: Love as a religious and political discourse in modern China through the lens of political leaders. Critical Research on Religion, 8(1), pp 39-52.

Haghighat, S.S.2003. The confusion of political concepts in contemporary Iran.Political Science.6(24):69-94. ]In Persian.[

Joseph, L. 2021. Re-presenting protestors as thugs: The politics of labelling dissenting voices. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities. 12(5): Open Access in: https://www. scopus. com/

Keshavarz, M. H. 1988. Forms of address in post-revolutionary Iranian Persian: A sociolinguistic analysis. Language in society. Cambridge University Press. pp 565-575.
Keshavarz, P. 2010. Investigation of the use of political words approved by the Academy of Persian Language in the political section of the press. MA Thesis of Linguistics. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University. ]In Persian.[
Leo R. Ch And et al. 2019. Words hurt: Political rhetoric, emotions/affect, and psychological well-being among Mexican-origin youth. Social Science & Medicine (228), pp240-251.
Mansouri, M.2020. Diachronic analysis of kurdish language words(sorani): One hundred years of kurdish words. MA thesis, Tehran, Allameh Tabataba'i University. ]In Persian.[
Oddy, N. M. 2017. 'Europe' in Renaissance France: The word, its uses and contexts (c. 1540-1620). PhD Dissertation, Durham University. in: http://etheses. dur. ac. uk/12105/
Rahmanian, A. 2004. Political words and concepts in the treatises of the Qajar era. MA thesis. Tehran: Trabiat Modares University. ]In Persian.[
Rezaei, F.  and, Moradi, M. 2017.Evaluating Change of the Concept of Nation in the Qajar Period, Journal of Historical Researches, University of Sistan and Balouchestan,10(19):101-120. ]In Persian.[
Rezazadeh Zavaram, M. 2011. The evolution of military words in Persian. MA Thesis. Tehran: Payame Noor University of Tehran Center. ]In Persian.[
Sato,N & Sato,K. 2019. Statistical analysis of word usage in biological publications since 1965: Historical delineation highlighting an emergence of function-oriented discourses in contemporary molecular and cellular biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology.  462, pp 293-303.
Sherratt, Y. 2006. Continental Philosophy of Social Science. Translated by Jalili, H. Tehran: Ney Press. ]In Persian.[
Smart, B. 2002. Michel Foucault. NewYork: Routledge.
Tohidfam, M. 2003.State and democracy in the age of globalization. Tehran, Rowzaneh Press.
Zhang, H. 2019. Dynamic Word Embedding for News Analysis. Master of Science in Computer Science. University of California, Los Angeles, (Professor Kai-Wei Chang, Chair). in: https://escholarship. org/uc/item/9tp9g31f.
Zulnoor, A. 1994. The effect of developments of the Islamic Revolution of Iran on the changes of semantic domains in the Persian language. MA Thesis. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University. ]In Persian.[