Document Type : Research Paper


Associate Professor, Department of English, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.


Persian uses [o] and [va] as two conjunctions, both of which mean ‘and’. Interestingly, both are represented by the grapheme <و> in the Persian orthography. Accordingly, they are considered homofunction-homogragh conjunctions in the present research. The morpheme [o] is an enclitic that has reached the Modern Persian from the past after undergoing some phonological and categorical changes. The morpheme [va] is an Arabic loanword. The main reason for borrowing it from Arabic was to compensate for the impossibility of applying [o] in an environment where there is no host for [o] to attach to, or there is a pause between the host and [o]. Moreover, a speaker can produce [o] or [va] if he chooses not to pause after producing a word. This research aimed at analyzing the pronunciation of these conjunctions in various phonological environments applying optimality theory (Prince  & Smolensky, 1993/2004). In so doing, the constraints whose interactions within the rankings determine the pronunciation of these conjunctions are discussed. As the results regarding the enclitic conjunction [o] indicate, in case the first part of the parallel structure ends in a consonant, it will undergo resyllabification. However, if the first part of the parallel structure ends in a vowel, an intervocalic consonant will be inserted between it and the enclitic [o] to resolve hiatus. More specifically, if the first part of the parallel structure ends in one of the vowels [i], [u] or [o], the intervocalic consonant will share the same feature with them. But as other Persian vowels [e], [a] or [A] do not share a significant feature with Persian common intervocalic consonants, the intervocalic consonant will share the same feature with the enclitic [o]. Finally, when the conjunction /va/ conjoins a word starting with a long vowel, a ranking which contains a specific type of MAX constraint resolves hiatus by deleting /a/ and preserving the long vowel.


Main Subjects

Baković, E. 2000. Harmony, Dominance and Control. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers university, New Brunswick, NJ.
Boersma, P. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Utrecht: LOT.
Bussmann, H. 1996. Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.
Ghaderi, S. 2016. Natural and Accidental Coordination in Persian. Researches in Linguistics. 6(11): 19-33[In Persian].
Grami, B. and H. Assar, “Conjunctive Vav,Iran Namag, Volume 1, Number 4 (Winter 2017), 210-213 [In Persian].
     Haghshenas, A. M. 1977. Phonetics. Tehran: Agah Publications [In Persian]. Haspelmath, M. 2004. Coordinating constructions: An overview. In                       Martin Haspelmath (ed.). Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam/                Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 3-39.
Jam, B. 2012. The formation and distinction of dvandva compounds from  syntactic phrases in Persian. Researches in Linguistics. 4(2): 33-50 [In Persian].
Jam, B. 2013. A Dictionary of Old Persian Inscriptions. Tehran: Pazineh            Publications [In Persian].                                                                              Jam, B. 2015. Hiatus Resolution Strategies in Persian. Journal of                        Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects Biannual. 1(12): 79-100 [In Persian].
Jam, B. 2016. A Dictionary of Phonological Processes. Tehran: Iran University Press [In Persian].
Jam, B. 2017. On the Pronunciation of Postposition “râ”in Persian. Journal        of Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects Biannual. 1(16): 1-14 [In Persian].     Kent, R. G. 1953. Old Persian Grammar; Texts, Lexicon. 2nd rev. ed.                 New Haven: American Oriental Society.                                                    Lombardi, L. 1996. Positional Faithfulness and Voicing Assimilation in             Optimality Theory. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.  McCarthy. J. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge:               Cambridge University Press.
     McCarthy, J., & A. Prince, 1993."Generalized alignment. " In: Yearbook of                            morphology, eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle,79–153. Dordrecht:            Kluwer.                                                                                                          Mo’in, M. 1992. A Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing               Corporation [In Persian].
Naghzguy Kohan, M. 2013. A Study of Adversatives and Their Development in Persian. Language Related Research; 4 (4): 245-265 [In Persian].
Naghzguy Kohan, M., & Ahmadkhani, J. 2016.  Dvandva Coordination in Persian. Iranian Journal of Comparative Linguistic Research. 5 (10) 197-217 [In Persian].
Prince, A., & P. Smolensky, 1993/2004. Optimality theory: constraint in generative grammar.MIT Press.
 Rosenthall, Sam. 2006. Glide distribution in classical Arabic verb stems. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 405-40.
Samareh, Y. 1995. Persian Phonetics. Tehran: Iran University Press [In Persian].
Sha’bani, M., A. Kambouzia, F. Aghagolzadeh, & A. Golfam, 2010. Coordination Structure: A look at Persian Language”. Adab Pazhuhi.   13: Pp. 131-156 [In Persian].
 Shaghaghi, V. 1996. What is a Clitic? Is such notion used in Persian? In: Yahya Modarresi & Mohammad Dabir-Moghaddam (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Linguistics Conference. PP. 141-157 [In Persian].
 Skjoervø, P. O. 2009. Middle West Iranian. In: Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The   Iranian languages. London and New York: Routledge, 196 - 278.
Vafaee, A., & Aghababaee, S. 2015. Reflecting the artistic language in the translation of Nahj al Jafar Shahidi (With emphasis on the sermon, a first-Wise). The Biannual Journal of Literary Science. 4(7): 7-37 [In Persian].
Zipf, G. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Boston Addison Wesley.