Analyzing the Acquisition of Persian Homonymous Bound Morphemes by Azerbaijani/Persian Bilinguals Based on 4-M Model

Heydari, Abdolhossein

doi:10.22059/jolr.2021.314149.666667

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

abdolhossein heydari

Assistant Professor, Department of Language and Literature, University of Farhangian.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2021.314149.666667

Abstract

Affix ordering is a theoretical discussion in morphology. There has been some debate over the existence of general principles or mechanisms governing affix ordering. In this regard, we can point to three principal approaches. The first approach named the stratum-oriented model (Siegel, 1974; Allen, 1978; Kiparsky, 1982; Mohanan, 1986), believes that lexicon has a layered structure and can determine the affixes' combinations. The second approach relies on Selectional Restrictions' affix oriented (Fabb, 1988; Plag, 1999). These restrictions include restrictions of the group of affixes and phonological, morphological, semantic, and syntax restrictions. This approach claims that the description of possible and impossible combinations of affixes is related to describing the functions of restrictions. The third approach formed the theoretical framework of the present study by providing a psycho-linguistic model based on this idea that the affix ordering is a function of the degree of parsability of affixes from their bases (Hay 2000; 2002). According to this approach, affixes parsed easily in language processing cannot stay near the base relative to the affixes with a lower degree of parsability. Plag (2003) called the approach as Complexity-Based Ordering (CBO). The question is that how can we describe the Persian derivational prefixes ordering based on the CBO framework. For this reason, by selecting 17 prefixes 2200 derivational words extracted from database. By considering prefixes co-occurrences the rank of each prefix was obtained by using directed-graph and upper triangle square matrixes. According to this theoretical framework, by using frequency of derivational words and bases we could draw the scatter plot and determined the rank of type and token frequency ratio. Finally, according to data and by using the rank of parsability, type and token frequency ratio, we assessed the continuum of Persian prefixes ordering. Similar to Hay and Plag (2004) findings, this approach can describe Persian prefixes ordering as well as English affixes ordering

Keywords

Main Subjects

Click subject name to see related articles.

References

Azizi, N. & Kohzadi, M. 2014. The Writing Errors Analysis of the Fifth GradBilingual Students in Sanandaj. Research in Teaching, 2 (1), 19-32. [In Persian]

Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. 1974. Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24 (2), 235-243.

Bakenov, A., Mirzaei Hassarian, M., & Golpour, L. 2020. Writing errors analysis of Kazakh Persian language learners based on Corder Model. Journal of Language research, 10 (2), 45-65. [In Persian]

Corder, S. P. 1982. Introducing Applied Linguistics. Harmondsworth, England, Penguin Books. [first published in 1973].

Crystal, D. 1986. Listen to your child. London: Penguin Books LTd.

Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. 1973. Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23(2), 245-258.

Ellis, N. C. 2006. Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164-194.

Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. 2001. Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. 2001. Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1-50.

Hamp, E., Joos, M., Housholder, F., & Austerlitz, R. 1995. Readings in Linguistics I & II. University of Chicago Press.

Hakuta, K. 1976. A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language. Language Learning, 26(2), 321-351.

Heydari, A. 2018. Analyzing the use of the dependent morphemes of noun in Azerbaijani/Persian bilinguals’ writing based on 4-M model. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 7(2), 147-164. [In Persian]

Hulstijn, J. H. 2015. Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be?. Language Learning, 65(1), 210-232.

Keshavarz, M. H. 2012. Contrastive Analysis and Error Analysis. Tehran: Rahnama Press. [first published in 1993].

Krashen, S. D. 1977. Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In H. D. Brown, C. Yorio and R. Crymes (Eds.) On TESOL'77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice. Washington: TESOL, pp.144-158.

ـــــــــــــــــــــــ. 2009. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Retrieved April, 7, 2015, from http: // ibatefl. Com / wpcontent / uploads /2012/ 08/ Principles and Practice-in -L2-Acquisition. pdf

Kwon, E. Y. 2005. The" natural order" of morpheme acquisition: A historical survey and discussion of three putative determinants. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 5(1).

Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Luk, Z. P. S., & Shirai, Y. 2009. Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles, and possessive ’s. Language Learning, 59(4), 721-754.

Monshizade, M., & KHanbabazade, K. 2014. Syntactic errors of Talishi-speaking learners in Persian. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 1(6), 117-135. [In Persian]

Motavalian Nayini, R. & Malekian, R. (2014). Analyzing the syntactic errors of Urdu-speaking learners of Persian. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 1, 31-64. [In Persian]

Myers-Scotton, C. 1997. Code-switching. In F. Coulmas (ED.), The handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 217-237). London: Blackwell.

Myers-Scotton, C. 2002. Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Myers-Scotton, C. 2006. Multiple Voices: An introduction to bilingualism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Myers-Scotton, C. 2008. Language contact: Why outsider system morphemes resist transfer. Journal of Language Contact, 2, 21– 41.

Parvaneh Parikhani, H. 2004. Analyzing writing errors of Azari students in learning Persian. M. A. dissertation. Allameh Tabatabai university. [In Persian]

Shaghaghi, V. 2007. An Introduction to Morphology. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]

Wei, L. 2000. Types of morphemes and their implications for L₂ morpheme acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(1),

29ـــ43.

Language Research

Analyzing the Acquisition of Persian Homonymous Bound Morphemes by Azerbaijani/Persian Bilinguals Based on 4-M Model

References

References

Volume 12, Issue 1
July 2021
Pages 97-120

Analyzing the Acquisition of Persian Homonymous Bound Morphemes by Azerbaijani/Persian Bilinguals Based on 4-M Model

References

References

Volume 12, Issue 1July 2021Pages 97-120

Volume 12, Issue 1
July 2021
Pages 97-120