Language Research

Vowel Quality in Persian: Stable or Unstable?

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Vahid Sadeghi 1
Niloofar Mansoory Harehdasht 2

1 Imam Khomeini International University English Department, Imam Khomeini International University, Imam Khomeini Boulevard, Qazvin

2 Payam Noor University

https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2016.57500
Abstract
This paper addresses the validity of two hypotheses concerning changes of vowel quality in Persian. The theory of centralization claims that there is a strong correlation between vowel duration and vowel quality. As vowel duration is shortened in unstressed contexts, the size of the vowel inventory reduces toward the center, leading to considerable overlap between different categories and a reduced, crowded acoustic space. In contrast, the dispersion theory of speech perception maintains that there is no correlation between vowel duration and vowel quality, and that vowels are arranged in the acoustic vowel space so as to minimize the potential for perceptual confusion between the distinct vowel categories. Changes in vowel quality were examined in unstressed syllables using duration and F1 and F2 spectral values. Results indicated that, contrary to the prediction of the centralization hypothesis, there was no strong correlation between duration and vowel quality differences, and that vowels displayed no significant spatial reduction in the direction of the center of the vowel space. The results are more consistent with the dispersion theory as they show that differences in quality in Persian are limited to small positions around the area in the acoustic space occupied by vowel categories. In light of our findings, we may well classify Persian with languages which do not possess the process of vowel reduction.

Keywords

vowel quality
vowel space
Stress
centralization
dispersion theory
بی­جن­خان، محمود (1392). نظام آوایی زبان فارسی، تهران، سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها  )سمت(، مرکز تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی.
شیخ­سنگ­ تجن، شهین. و بی­جن­خان، محمود (1389). بررسی کاهش واکه­ای در زبان فارسی محاوره ای.پژوهش هایزبانشناسی. سال دوم، شماره اول، 35-47.
صادقی، وحید (1394). بررسی آوایی کاهش واکه­ای در زبان فارسی. جستارهای زبانی. دوره شش، شماره 3، 165-187 
کرد زعفرانلو کامبوزیا، عالیه (1379).واجشناسی خودواحد و کاربرد آن در فرایندهای واجی زبان فارسی. پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، گروه زبانشناسی.

 

مدرسی قوامی، گلناز (1392). تأثیر تکیة واژگانی بر ویژگی‌های کیفی واکه‌های ساده زبان فارسی. علم زبان. دورۀ 1، شماره 1، 41-57.

Boresma, P., & D. Weenink. 2010. Praat: doing phonetics by computer, version 5.1.27, praat manual. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat.
Bradlow, A. 1995. A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(3).
Cutler, A. 2005. Lexical stress, In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 390-413),Blackwell.
Delattre, P. 1969. The general phonetic characteristics of languages. An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. Final Report, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Disnet, S. 1983. Vowel quality: The relation between universal and language-specific factors. UCLA Working Paper in Phonology, 58: 1-158.
Flemming, E. 2004. Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In Hayes et al. (eds.), Phonetically-based phonology (233–276), Cambridge:   Cambridge University Press.
Fourakis, M., A. Botinis, & M. Katsaiti. 1999. Acoustic characteristics of Greek vowels, Phonetica: 56: 28-43.
Keating, P. 1984. Vaowel variation in Japanese, Phonetica, 41: 191-207.
Lazard, G. 1992. Grammar of Contemporary Persian, Mazda publishers.
Liljencrants, J. & B. Lindblom. (1972). Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast, Language, 48: 839-862.
Lindblom, B. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35: 1773–1781.
Lindblom, B. 1989. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H &H theory, In W. Hardcastle  and A . Marchal (Eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, (pp . 403-439), Dordrecht: Kluwer. 
Lindblom, B. & O. Engstrand. 1989. In what sense is speech quantal?  Journal of Phonetics, 17:107-121.
Lindblom, B. & S. J. Moon. 1988. Formant undershoot in clear and citation-form speech, Perilus VII, Stockholm University.
Mooshammer, C. & C. Geng. 2008. Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38 (2): 118-135.
Nord, L. 1986. Acoustic studies of vowel reduction in Swedish, Journal of Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 27: 19-36.
Van der Hulst, H. G. 1999. Word accent. In H. van der Hulst (ed.),
          Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe (pp. 3-
          116), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Language Research
Volume 6, Issue 2
January 2016
Pages 61-80

  • Receive Date 25 January 2016
  • Revise Date 20 February 2016
  • Accept Date 29 February 2016

Home

Contact Us