Deictic Projection of Present Perfect in Persian: A Semantic Analysis

Amoozadeh, Mohammad; Dianati, Masoume; Azimdokht, Zoleikha

doi:10.22059/jolr.2017.63137

Deictic Projection of Present Perfect in Persian: A Semantic Analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Mohammad Amoozadeh ¹

Masoume Dianati ²

Zoleikha Azimdokht ²

¹ Associate Professor of Linguistics, Isfahan University

² Ph.D. Candidate in General Linguistics, University of Isfahan

10.22059/jolr.2017.63137

Abstract

This study provides a semantic analysis of the present perfect of Persian expressing immediate and definite futurity. This phenomenon will be tackled in terms of deictic projection. To this end, after a brief introduction of some of the related concepts, the paper examines the ways in which a Persian speaker employs the present perfect to actualize a future situation for his/her communicative ends. In a sense, the lexical, grammatical and pragmatic elements contributing to this specific use will be analyzed by the exemplification of deictic projection. The results obtained from this study reveals that the certainty of a given event is the speaker’s main motivation to use the present perfect tense designating futurity. Moreover, in order to have such a pragmatic use, the sentence in present perfect needs to be affirmative in most of the cases on the one hand, and the presence of an adverb of time referring to a limited period of time and pointing to a definite end point in future, is necessary, on the other. The semantic and contextual analysis of this kind of usage shows that an inchoative aspect for the verbs in these types of sentences are deemed operational. Although it is possible to project present perfect to express futurity in the case of verbs referring to an action and dynamic situations, such a use is not possible for state verbs, except for some limited cases in a specific context. Furthermore, in this particular kind of projection, a meaning of epistemic modality is generally observable.

Keywords

deictic projection

tense

aspect

Modality

adverb

polarity

احمدیگیوی، حسن؛ حسن انوری (1389). دستور زبان فارسی 1، تهران، فاطمی.

ارژنگ، غلامرضا (1374). دستور زبان فارسی امروز، تهران، قطره.

استاجی، اعظم؛ فاخته نخاولی (1391). بررسی نمود، تمایزات نمودی عمده و زمان در زبان فارسی. مجموعه مقالات هشتمین همایش زبان‌شناسی ایران، تهران، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

انزلی، حسن (1366). دستور زبان فارسی، ارومیه، انزلی.

خانلری، پرویز (1362). دستور زبان فارسی، تهران، توس.

خیامپور، عبدالرسول، (1386). دستور زبان فارسی، تبریز، ستوده.

عموزاده، محمد؛ حدائق رضایی (1391). بررسی مفاهیم وجهی زمان دستوری در زبان فارسی. پژوهش‌های زبانی، د. س، ش 1، صص 53-76.

واحدیلنگرودی، محمدمهدی (1381). تحلیل نحوی و دستوری شدن زمان آینده همراه با فعل خواستن در زبان فارسی. مجله بینالمللی علوم انسانی، د.9، ش.2، صص 35-21.

Amouzadeh, M. 2006. Pragmatic Perspective on the Preterite in Persian, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University,23(1): 11-20.

Bhat, D.N.1999. The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood, USA, John Benjamin.

Comrie, B.1976. Aspect, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Comrie, B.1985. Tense, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Descles, J. P. and Z. Guentcheva. 2003. Comment déterminer les significations du passé composé par une exploration contextuelle? Langue française, 138: 48–60.

De Saussure, L.2011. la passé composé en usage futur et la pertinence au présent, French language Studies, Vol. 22, Issue 02: 189-206.

Grech, N.I.1827. Prostrannaja russkaja grammatical, St. Petersburg.

Hansen, C.F.2006. Tense, In K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, second edition(566-573),Elsevier Publication.

Klein, W.1994. Time in Language, U.S.A and Canada, Routledge.

Lyons, J.1977. Semantics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Reichenbach, H.1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York, Free Press.

Smith, C. S. (1997).The Parameter of Aspect, Dordrecht, Kluwer.

Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition, 2^nd edition, Oxford, Blackwell.

Tavangar, M and Mohammad Amouzadeh. 2006. Deictic Projection: An Inquiry into the Future-oriented Past Tense in Persian, Studia Linguistica, 60(1): 97-120.

Tavangar, M and Mohammad Amouzadeh. 2009. Subjective modality and Tense in Persian, Language Sciences, 31: 853-873.

Vendler, Z.1967. Linguistics in Philosoph, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.