Document Type : Research Paper


1 General Linguistics University of Tehran

2 Assistance Professor of General LinguisticsUniversity of Tehran


All languages in the world use different ways to create new words. One of these ways is Compounding. In many languages, Compounding (also called composition) is the most frequently used way of making new lexemes. Its defining property is that it consists of the combination of lexemes into larger words. Compounds are words that are composed of two (or more) bases, roots, or stems. In other word, compounding consists of the combination of two words, in which one word modifies the meaning of the other, the head. This means that compounds have a binary structure. The productivity of compounding in many languages is largely due to its semantic transparency and versatility. When a new compound is formed, we already know the meaning of its constituents, and the only task we face is to find out the semantic relation between the two parts. In Persian, compounding and derivation are the most frequently used way of making new words. Many Iranian linguists have written articles about compounding. Classification of compounds has been and still is a much-debatable issue in the linguistic literature. In this article, we will review other classifications and then introduce a new classification which is based on a morphosyntactic approach and focus on the structure of words. According to this new classification, there are two types of compounds: root compounds and synthetic compounds. Synthetic compounds have v element in their structure but root compounds don’t have this element. Presence of v element in the structure of the compounds creates a dual situation which logically doesn’t have a third option and this is not reputable. Indeed it cannot be violated.


Anoushe, M. 2015, Aspect and Tens projections in the complex agentiveAdjectives: A         Distributed Morphology approach, JostarhayeZabani, Volume 6, Issue 5, Page 49- 72. [In Persian].
ـــــــــــــــــ 2018, A Revision of Persian Past Tense Inflection: A            Distributed       Morphology     Approach, Jostarha-ye zabani, Volume 9,            Issue 1, Page 57-80. [In Persian].     
Asi, M. & Badakhshan, E., 2010, Classification of compounds, Persianlanguage and literature,         Issue 46, Page 71-94. [In Persian].
Bally, Charles. 1950. Linguistique generate et linguistique francaise, 2nd edition. Berne: Francke.
Bauer, L. 1983. English word formation, New York: Cambridge UniversityPress.
Bobaljik, J. D. 2011. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion,    Superlatives, and the structure of words. Under contract: MIT Press.
Booij, G. E. 2009. Compound Construction: Schemas or Analogy? A            Construction Morphology Perspective. In Cross-disciplinary studies        in comounding. S. Scalise and I. Vogel (Eds.). Amesterdam/   Philadelphia: Benjamins, 93-108.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 2002. An introduction to English morphology: wordsand their structure, Edinburgh University Press.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program: MIT Press.
Fabb, N. 1998. Compounding, Handbook of Morphology, Blackwell: Oxford, 66-83.
Halle, M. & A. Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces ofinflection, In: K, Hale        & S.J. Keyser (Eds), The view fromBuilding 2, Essays in linguistics in Honour of SylvainBromberger, 111-176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
ـــــــــــــــــ 2009. Compounding in Distributed Morphology, The Oxfordhandbook of compounding, New York: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. 2002. Understanding Morphology, London: Arnold.  
Katamba, F. & Stonham, J. T., 2006. Morphology (2nd ed.). Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Khabaz, M. 2007, The position of head in non-verbal compounds in Persian, Dastoor, Issue 3, Page 153-166. [In Persian].
Lieber, R. & Štekauer, 2009. The Oxford handbook of compounding, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 2016. The lexical semantic approach to compounding. In P. tenHacken, ed, The Semantics of Compounding, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 38-53.
Marchand, H. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English          Word-Formation. 2nd  edition. Munich: Beck.
Montermini, F. 2010. Units in compounding. In Scalise, S. Vogel, CrossDisciplinary Issue in Compounding, John Benjamins PublishingCompany.
Noyer, R. 1997. Feature and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure, New York NY, Garland.
Pahlevan nezhad, M. 2006, Persian compound words: A syntactic- semantic Approach, Journal of   faculty of human sciencs and literature of Ferdowsi University, Year 39, Issue 3, Page 147-159. [In Persian]. 
Sabzevari, M. 2012, Analysis and explanation of semantic relations in exocentric compounds in modern Persian, Critical study, Year 12,  Issue 1, Page 54-61. [In Persian].  
ـــــــــــــــــ 2013, Analysis of the semantic transparency and opacity incompound Noun of          Farsi with a cognitive Approach, Jostarha ye zabani, Volume 4, Issue 3, Page 55-73. [In Persian].
Sadeghi, A. 1991, Contemporary Persian Fiction (1), Danesh, Year 7, Issue 64, June and July, Page 256-262. [In Persian].
ـــــــــــــــــ 1992, Contemporary Persian Fiction (5), Danesh, Year 8, Issue 70, June and July, Page 39-45. [In Persian].
Scalise, S. Bisetto, B. 2009. The Classification of Compounds, In: The Oxford handbook of compounding, Oxford, New York: Oxford         University Press.
Shaghaghi, V. 2007, An Introduction to Morphology, Tehran: Samt. [InPersian].
ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 2009. Syntax within the word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Siddiqi, D. 2014. The Morphology-Syntax Interface. In: Carnie, A. Y. Sato and D. Siddiqi    (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of syntax (345364), NY: Routledge.
Spencer, A. 2002. Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tabatabaei, A. 2007, Compounding in Persian (1), Name-ye Farhangestan, Year 9, Volume 35, Page 186-196. [In Persian]. 
ــــــــــــــــــ 2015, Componding in Persian: structural study of compoundwords, Farhangestan, Asar. [In Persian].