Language Research

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Journal Metrics

Cooperation with the institution or association

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Conflict of interest form

The original form of the work

English work sample

Publication cost

Persian example

Guide for Authors

How to write references and sources

Registration guide in Pablones

referee

Primary and Secondary Predicate Ellipsis in Complement and Adjunct Small Clauses: A minimalist Approach (Phase Theory)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran,

2 Department of Linguistics, Faculty of literature and humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran,

Abstract

The phenomenon of the head- and constituent ellipsis is one of the most discussed issues that grammarians have given a different name to each of its types. The present paper deals with a specific type of ellipsis within the clause, which is referred to, in the tradition of generative grammar, as the Right Node Raising, and it is distinct from the deletion of the second coordinate clause, namely gapping. In the aforementioned ellipsis, the verb alone, or together with its dependents, is removed from the first coordinate clause. While examining such structures, the present article analyzes the ellipsis from the coordinate clauses which contain a complement or adjunct small clause, and therefore, due to the simultaneous deletion of the primary predicate (from the main clause) and the secondary predicate (from the subordinate clause), they represent more syntactic complexity of its own. In the analysis, which is based on the assumption of two processes, namely the “verb movement out of the vP” and the “object shift”, the discussed structures are divided into two types: coordinates with a common subject and ones with a non-common subject; and thus, a different explanation is provided for each kind. In coordinates that have a common subject and host a small clause in their argument structure, in fact, two vPs, and not two clauses, are coordinated, and the process known as Across-the-Board movement, which is applied to the verb and the subject of the clause, leaves some gaps in the first coordinate clause in place. In contrary, the ellipsis phenomenon is applied to coordinates with non-common subjects. Since this phenomenon occurs at PF level, it is expected that its occurrence is related to the phase domain. In this research, based on the Phase Theory, as well as the empirical evidence of the Persian, we argue that in the latter structures, ellipsis occurs at the higher phase stage, and the elements that have already reached the edge of the phase are pronounced at the phonetic level, following the Phase Impenetrability Condition.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
dger, D. (2003). Core Syntax, a Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anoushe, M. (2018). Gapping and Sluicing in Persian: A Minimalist Approach, Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects 10 (18): 101-123. [In Persian].
Anoushe, M. (2021). Morphology in Syntax: From Minimalism to Distributed Morphology, Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
Anvari H. and H. Ahmadi Givi (2011 [2000]). Persian Grammar Vol 1, 4th ed., Tehran: Fatemi. [In Persian].
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N. and Nunes, J. (2010). Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowers, J. (2001). Predication.  In: M. Baltin and Ch. Collins (Eds). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory (229-333). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Chomsky, N. (1972). Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational Grammar. In: Paul Stanley Peters (Ed). Goals of Linguistic Theory (63–130). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1989). Some note on economy of derivation and representation. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 43-74. Also in R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar (417–54). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads, A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. NY: Oxford University Press.
Citko, B. (2014). Phase Theory. An introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corver, N. (2006). Comparative deletion and subdeletion. In: M. Everaert and H.V. Riemsdijk (Eds). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (I: 582-637). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Craenenbroeck, J.V and Merchant, J. (2013). Ellipsis phenomena. In: M. den Dikken (Ed). The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax (701-745). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darzi, A. (1996). Word order, NP movement, and opacity conditions in Persian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Darzi, A. and Anoushe, M. (2010). The Main Verb Movement in Persian: A Minimalist Approach, Journal of Language Research 2 (3): 21-55. [In Persian]
Dikken, Den M. (2006). Relators and linkers: the syntax of prediction, predicate inversion, and copulas. MA: MIT Press.
Farshid Vard, K. (2003). A contemporary detailed Grammar, Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian].
Folli, R., Harley, H. and Karimi, S. (2005). Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua, 115: 1365–1401.
Gharib, A. et al. (1984). Persian Grammar, Tehran: Farhang. [In Persian].
Haegeman, L. (1995). The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, L. and Lohndal, T. (2013). Negation. In: S. Luraghi and C. Parodi (Eds). The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax (354-364). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J. and Grohmann, K.K. (2005). Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hornstein, N. (2009). A Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hornstein, N. and Nunes, J. (2014). Minimalism and control. In: A. Carnie, Y. Sato, and D. Siddiqi (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Syntax (239-263). NY: Routledge.
Jackendoff, R.S. (1971). Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2:21–35.
Johnson, K. (2001). What VP Ellipsis Can Do, and What it Can’t, but not why. In: M. Baltin and Ch. Collins (Eds). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory (439-480). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Johnson, K. (2006). Gapping. In: M. Everaert and H.V. Riemsdijk (Eds). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (II: 405-435). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Johnson, K. (2009). Gapping Is Not (VP-) Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40:289–328.
Karimi, S. (2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Karimi, Y. and Azmoudeh, H. (2013). Verb Phrase Ellipsis in Persian: The Structural Question, Language Related Research 3 (2): 77-94. [In Persian].
Karimi, Y. and Azmoudeh, H. (2016). Verb Phrase Ellipsis in Persian: The Questions of Identity and Licensing, Language Research 6 (2): 101-120. [In Persian].
Karimi-Doostan G, Tajalli V. (2019). Persian Adverbs of Manner Revisited. Language Related Research 10 (4) :259-281. [In Persian].
Khanlari, P. (1972). Persian Grammar, Tehran: Bonyad-e-Farhang-e-Iran. [In Persian].
Khayyampour, A. (1945). Persian Grammar, Tabriz: University of Tabriz. [In Persian]
Lobeck, A. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional, Heads, Licensing, and Identification, New York: Oxford University press.
Merchant, J. 2008. An asymmetry in voice mismatches in VP-ellipsis and pseudo gapping, Linguistic Inquiry, 39:169–179.
Merchant, J. 2013. Diagnosing Ellipsis, In L. Cheng, and N. Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax (537-542), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2016. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. Ms, University of Chicago.
Muysken, P. and Veenstra, T (2006). Serial Verbs. In: M. Everaert and H.V. Riemsdijk (Eds). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (IV: 234–270). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Osmani, M., et al. (2019). The Ellipsis of the Verb Phrase in Sanandaji Kurdish: A Minimalist Approach, Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects 7 (2): 77-94. [In Persian].
Rasekhi, V. (2014). Missing object in Persian. Ms. Stony brook University.
Rasekhi, V. (2018). Ellipsis and information structure: Evidence from Persian. Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
Rasekh Mahand, M. (2012). A Functional Account of Ellipsis in Persian Co-ordinate Sentences, Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects 3 (5), 35-45. [In Persian].
Ross, J.R. (1970). Gapping and the order of constituents. In: M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph (Eds). Progress in linguistics (249-259). The Hague: Mouton.
Rothstein, S. (2006). Secondary Predication. In: M. Everaert and H.V. Riemsdijk (Eds). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (IV: 209-234). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and Logical Form. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sato, Y., & Karimi, S. (2016). Subject-object asymmetries in Persian argument ellipsis and the anti-agreement theory. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1: 1-31.
Shabani M. (2015). Right Node Raising: A Nonhomogeneous Construction in Persian. Language Related Research 6 (2) :151-172. [In Persian].
Shabani M. (2016). V-stranding VP ellipsis in Persian: A minimalist approach. Language Related Research 7 (5) :97-118. [In Persian].
Shafiei ILkhechy, N. (2015). Ellipsis in Persian Complex Predicates: VVPE or Something Else. Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic 1-15.
Shafiei ILkhechy, N. (2016) Persian Complex Predicates: Evidence for Verb Movement from Ellipsis and Negatipn. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Calgary (Canada).
Shari’at, M. J. (1985). Persian Grammar, Tehran: Asatir. [In Persian].
Vahidian Kamyar, T. and G. Omrani (2001). Persian Grammar Vol. 1, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian].
Vikner, S. (2006). Object Shift. In: M. Everaert and H.V.Riemsdijk (Eds). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (III: 392–436). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Tabatabaei, A. (2016). Descriptive Dictionary of Persian Grammar, Theran: Farhange-e-Mo’aser. [In Persian].
Taleghani, A.H. (2008). Modality, Aspect and Negation in Persian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Toosarvandani, M. 2007. Ellipsis in Farsi complex predicates, Syntax, 12: 60-92.
Yoshida, M., Nakao, Ch. and Ortega-Santos, I. (2014). The syntax of ellipsis and related phenomena. In: A, Carnie, Y. Sato, and D. Siddiqi (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Syntax (192-213). NY: Routledge.
Language Research
Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 25
May 2023
Pages 105-134
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 23 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 03 December 2022
  • Accept Date: 01 February 2023
Share
How to cite
Statistics