Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of English, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.

Abstract

 
translator



Afrikaans
Albanian - shqipe
Arabic - ‎‫العربیة‬‎
Armenian - Հայերէն
Azerbaijani - azərbaycanca
Basque - euskara
Belarusian - беларуская
Bengali - বাংলা
Bulgarian - български
Catalan - català
Chinese - 中文(简体中文)
Chinese - 中文 (繁體中文)
Croatian - hrvatski
Czech - čeština
Danish - dansk
Dutch - Nederlands
English
Esperanto - esperanto
Estonian - eesti
Filipino
Finnish - suomi
French - français
Galician - galego
Georgian - ქართული
German - Deutsch
Greek - Ελληνικά
Gujarati - ગુજરાતી
Haitian Creole - kreyòl ayisyen
Hebrew - ‎‫עברית‬‎
Hindi - हिन्दी
Hungarian - magyar
Icelandic - íslenska
Indonesian - Bahasa Indonesia
Irish - Gaeilge
Italian - italiano
Japanese - 日本語
Kannada - ಕನ್ನಡ
Korean - 한국어
Latin - Lingua Latina
Latvian - latviešu
Lithuanian - lietuvių
Macedonian - македонски
Malay - Bahasa Melayu
Maltese - Malti
Norwegian - norsk
Persian - ‎‫فارسی‬‎
Polish - polski
Portuguese - português
Romanian - română
Russian - русский
Serbian - Српски
Slovak - slovenčina
Slovenian - slovenščina
Spanish - español
Swahili - Kiswahili
Swedish - svenska
Tamil - தமிழ்
Telugu - తెలుగు
Thai - ไทย
Turkish - Türkçe
Ukrainian - українська
Urdu - ‎‫اردو‬‎
Vietnamese - Tiếng Việt
Welsh - Cymraeg
Yiddish - יידיש






 



 
Double-click

 
Select to translate


Sound substitution is a process whereby a phoneme in a loanword is replaced by its closest phone in the borrowing language. English and Arabic share dental consonants /D/ and /T/ which are absent in Persian. This comparative study aimed at explaining how these consonants are substituted by Persian speakers within the framework of optimality theory (Prince and Smolensky, 1993/2004). The findings of this research indicate that their substitution in English (loan) words depends on their position in the syllable; the dental consonants /D/ and /T/ are replaced by the dento-alveolar consonants [dÏ] and [tÏ] respectively in the syllable onset of (loan)words because they are the closest consonants to dentals. However, /T/ changes to [s] in the coda position since the markedness constraint ‘LAZY’ which favors sounds produced with less energy prohibits the substitution of /T/ by the more effortful stop consonant [tÏ] in this syllable position. With regard to Arabic (loan)words, the substitution of the dental consonants /D/ and /T/ (which are represented by the graphemes  <ذ>  and <ث> respectively in Arabic orthography) depends on how these graphemes are pronounce in Persian. Therefore, this process cannot be explained using an analysis that is solely phonological. So, there is a need for an analysis which incorporates graphemes as well. Technically speaking, a constraint which has access to graphematical information is needed. Some optimality theory phonologists who came up with this need while working on other languages have already proposed orthographic constraints as the third type in addition to faithfulness and markedness constraints. Accordingly, the pronunciation of the graphemes <ذ> and <ث> in words adapted from Arabic by Persian was analysed using orthographic constraints which require these graphemes to be always pronunced [z] and [s] respectively. This comparative study presents arguments in favor of different constraint rankings which cause the occurances of these processes

Highlights

 
 
Double-click
 
Select to translate

 

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
 
Double-click
 
Select to translate

 

 
 
Akidah, M. A. 2013. Phonological and semantic change in language borrowing:The case of Arabic words borrowed into Kiswahili. International Journal of Education and Research,1(4), 1-20.
Baroni, A. 2013. Eye dialect and casual speech spelling: orthographic variation in OT, Writing Systems Research 5.1, 24-53.
Baroni, A. 2016. Constraint interaction and writing systems typology Dossiers d’HEL, SHESL, Écriture(s) et représentations du langage et des langues, 9, pp.290-303.
Campbell, L. 1998. Historical Linguistics: an Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Davis, S. & Kang, H. (2006).'English loanwords and the word-final [t] problem in Korean. Language Research. 42 (2): 31-70.
Dong, X. 2012. What Borrowing Buys Us: A Study of Chinese Loanword Phonology. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.
Hall, T. 2004. Assibilation in Modern German. Lingua 114, 1035–1062. Hamann, Silke & Ilaria E. Colombo. 2017. A formal account of the interaction of orthography and perception: English intervocalic consonants borrowed into Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35:683–714.
 Holden, K. T. 1972. Loanwords and phonological systems. The University of Texas at Austin, Doctoral dissertation.
Jam, B. 2009. Optimality Theory and Its Application in Explaining Phonological Processes of Persian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian].
 Jam, B. 2016. A Dictionary of Phonological Processes. Tehran: Iran University Press. [In Persian].
 Jam, B. 2020. Vowel harmony in Persian. Lingua. Volume 246, pp.1-25.
  Jam, B. & razmdideh P. (2018). “A comparative study of Arabic velar phonemes substitution in standard Persian an Rudbari (kerman) dialect within optimality theory”. Journal of Zaban Pajuhi, 10 (26). Spring ed. Pp. 45- 66. [In Persian]. Kambouzia, A. K. Z. (2006). Phonology: Rule-based Approaches,Tehran, Samt Press. [In Persian].
Kambouzia, A. K. Z. & Hashemi, E. (2015). Phonological Adaptation of Vowels of Arabic loanwords in Persian: An Optimality Theoretic account. Language Related Research [Jostârhây-e Zabaâni], 6(7), 229-257. [In Persian].
Kirchner, R. 2001. An Effort Based Approach to Consonant Lenition. New York. Routledge. 
Miao, R. 2005.Loanword adaptation in Mandarin Chinese: Perceptual, phonological and sociolinguistic factors. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Linguistics, Stony Brook University.
Ozaki, S. 2014.Notes on English loanwords in Japanese: major sound transformations. Kiyo 15, Nagayo Bunri University, 29-40.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. 1993/2004.Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Rutgers University & University of Colorado at Boulder, Published 2004, Oxford: Blackwell.
Razmdideh, p. & Naseri, Z. S. 2019. “pronunciation errors of certain English consonants by Iranian pupils learning English. An Optimality Theory approach”. Journal of motaaleat Zaban va Tarjomeh. 52 (4).   Winter ed. Pp 133- 160. [In Persian].
Sarrami, V. 2022. An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis of English words Nativization in Persian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Isfahan: Isfahan University. [In Persian].
Satoer, D. 2009. Having FAITH in reading and spelling. An Optimality Theoretic study of Dutch children with poor reading skills. Master thesis. Utrecht University.
Song, H. J. & Wiese, R. 2010. Resistance to complexity interacting with visual shape–German and Korean orthography, Writing Systems Research 2.2, 87-103.
 Wiese, R. 2004. How to optimize orthography. Written Language &  Literacy, 7(2),  305–331.