Asadi, F. and Gowhari, H. 2019. Agreement, Information Structure, and Differential Object Marking in Kalhori Kurdish. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 11(2), 119-138. doi: 10.22108/jrl.2019.116160.1319 [in Persian]
Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, second edition
Bossong, Georg 1989. ‘Morphemic marking of topic and focus.’ In Kefer,Michel and van der Auwera, Johan (eds.) ‘Belgian Journal of Linguistics 4: Universals of Language,’ Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Bresnan, Joan and Mchombo, Sam A. 1987. ‘Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewˆ a.’ Language 63(4):741–782
Comrie, Bernard 2003. ‘When agreement gets trigger-happy.’ Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2):313–337
Croft, William 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad 1992. ‘On the (in)dependence of syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from the postposition -r¯a in Persian.’ In Stein, Dieter (ed.) ‘Cooperating with written texts: the pragmatics and comprehension of written texts,’ Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 549–573 [in Persian]
Dahl, ¨Osten and Fraurud, K. 1996. ‘Animacy in grammar and discourse.’ In Fretheim, Thorstein and Gundel, Jeanette K. (eds.) ‘Reference and referent accessibility,’ Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–64.
Dalrimple, M. and Nikolaeva, Irinia. 2010. Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051199373
de Swart, Peter 2007. Cross-linguistic Variation in Object Marking. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ghomeshi, J. 1997. Topics in Persian VPs. Lingua 102:133–167
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, and Zacharski, Ron 1993. ‘Cognitive status and the formof referring expressions in discourse.’ Language 69:274– 308
Karimi, S. 1990. Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions: Rˆa in Persian. Linguistic Analysis 20:139–191
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. ‘Towards a universal definition of subject.’ In Li, C. N. (ed.) ‘Subject and Topic,’ New York: Academic Press, pp. 303–333
Hockett, Charles 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan
Lambrecht, Knud 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Leonetti, Manuel 2003. ‘Specificity and object marking: the case of Spanish a.’ In von Heusinger, Klaus and Kaiser, Georg A. (eds.) ‘Proceedings of the Workshop Semantic and syntactic aspects of specificity in Romance languages,’ Konstanz: University of Konstanz, pp. 67–101
Morimoto, Yukiko 2009. ‘From topic to subject marking: Implications for a typology of subject marking.’ In de Hoop, Helen and de Swart, Peter (eds.) ‘Differential Subject Marking,’ Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 199–221
Nikolaeva, Irina 2001. ‘Secondary topic as a relation in information structure.’ Linguistics 39:1–49
Reinhart, Tanya 1982. ‘Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics.’ Philosophica 27:53–94
Rude, Noel 1986. ‘Topicality, transitivity, and the direct object in Nez Perce.’ International Journal of American Linguistics 52(2):124–153
Sasse, Hans-Jurgen 1984. ‘The pragmatics of noun incorporation in Eastern Cushitic.’ In Plank, Frans (ed.) ‘Objects: Towards a theory of grammatical relations,’ London Academic Press, pp. 243–268
Strawson, Paul F. 1964. ‘Identifying reference and truth-values.’ In Steinberg, Danny D. and Jakobovitz, Leon A. (eds.) ‘Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader,’ Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–99
Vallduv´ı, Enric 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland
Yamamoto, Mutsumi 1999. Animacy and reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
