The Modal Markers “dabe” and “dabɑ” in Mukriyani Kurdish

Radnia, Zanko; Karimi Doostan, Gholamhossein

doi:10.22059/jolr.2026.407488.666948

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Ph.D. Candidate of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

² Professor of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2026.407488.666948

Abstract

Modality is a semantic category which allows the speakers of a language to express their viewpoints on linguistic propositions and talk about the possibility and necessity of potential events. The present article attempts to investigate the interaction between tense and modality in Mukriyani Kurdish. Mukriyani is a subdialect of Sorani Kurdish which is spoken in some of the Kurdish-speaking cities in Iran such as Mahabad, Bukan, Sardasht, Piranshahr, Naqadeh, Oshnavieh, Miandoab, and Shahin Dezh. In Mukriyani, two words which are frequently employed by speakers as a means of expressing modality are “dabe” and “dabɑ”. They belong to the verbal category and are the equivalents of “bɑjad” and “bɑjesti” in Persian. These modal verbs convey strong necessity (in terms of modal force) and thus are used to express deontic and epistemic modal flavors. The current research indicates that the difference between these two modal verbs lies in the grammatical category of tense, such that “dabe” is marked for the present and “dabɑ” for the past. The results of this paper point to the fact that tense plays an integral role and exercises an important influence on the modules of syntax and semantics. In the domain of syntax, the tense of the modal verb determines the tense of the main verb. Otherwise phrased, the [present] feature of “dabe” dictates the main verb to appear in the present tense as well. In the same fashion, the [past] feature of “dabɑ” causes the main verb to appear in the past tense. In the semantic domain, grammatical tense is instrumental in rendering the modal interpretation of these verbs. More specifically, our findings indicate that “dabɑ” can only be used in order to express deontic modality in the past, whereas “dabe” can be utilized in order to express deontic modality in the present or future as well as epistemic modality. In this context, grammatical aspect is the underlying element which lends us support in distinguishing between the deontic and epistemic interpretations. If “dabe” is accompanied by the perfect aspect, the interpretation is going to be epistemic, but if aspect is lacking in the sentence, the interpretation is going to be deontic

Keywords

Main Subjects

Click subject name to see related articles.

References

Akhoondi Poor, Negin (2012). A Syntactic-Semantic Perspective on Ezafe in Persian Adjectives. Master's Thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].

Akhoondi Poor, Negin (2016). Ezafe in Complement Clauses. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].

Etemadzadeh, Mohammad & Hadayiq Rezaei (2010). "Semantic Dimensions of 'Bayad' (Must) in Persian". Language Research, 1(1), pp. 57-78. [In Persian].

Ilkhani Pour, Negin (2012). A Syntactic-Semantic Perspective on Mood in Persian Adjectives. Master's Thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].

Ilkhani Pour, Negin (2016). Mood in Complement Clauses. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].

Marandi, Roonak (2012). Mood and Mood Marking in Sorani Kurdish: A Syntactic and Semantic Approach. Doctoral Dissertation, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].

Marandi, Roonak (2013). "Auxiliary Verbs of Mood in Sorani Kurdish". Studies in the Languages and Dialects of Western Iran, 1(2), pp. 117-134. [In Persian].

Moradi, Rounak (2013). Mood and Mood Marking in Sorani Kurdish: A Syntactic and Semantic Approach. Doctoral Dissertation, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].

Moradi, Roonak (2014). "Mood Auxiliary Verbs in Sorani Kurdish". Studies in the Languages and Dialects of Western Iran, 1(2), pp. 117-134. [In Persian].

Naghargouy Kahan, Mehrdad & Zanyar Nasrabadi (2016). "An Analysis of Mood Verbs in Hawrami". Linguistic Studies, 7(3), pp. 223-243. [In Persian].

Nasrabadi, Zanyar (2015). Mood in the Hawrami Language. Doctoral Dissertation, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran. [In Persian].

Rahimian, Jalal (2009). "Formal and Semantic Aspects of Definite Elements in Persian Subordinate Clauses". Linguistics and Khorasanian Dialects, 1(1), pp. 85-91. [In Persian].

Uneshi, Mazdak (2021). Inflection in Syntax: From Minimalism to Distributed Morphology. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.[In Persian].

Abraham, W. (2020). Modality in Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Barbiers, S. (2006). The Syntax of Modal Auxiliaries. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (Vol. 1, pp. 1–22). Wiley Blackwell.

Bedirxan, C. A., & Lescot, R. (1970). Grammaire Kurde (Dialecte Kurmandji). Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient.

Blau, J, & Barak, V (1999). Manuel de Kurde: Kurmancî. L’Harmattan.

Blau, J. (2000). Méthode de Kurde: Sorani. L’Harmattan.

Borgonovo, C., & Cummins, S. (2007). Tensed Modals. In Coreference, Modality, and Focus (Vol. 111, pp. 1–18). John Benjamins Publishing.

Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge University Press.

Demirdache, H., & Uriba-Etxebarria, M. (2008). On the Temporal Syntax of Non-Root Modals. In Time and Modality (pp. 79–114). Springer Dordrecht.

Hacquard, V. (2010). On the Event Relativity of Modal Auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics, 18(1), 79–114.

Hacquard, V. (2011). Modality. In An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Vol. 2, pp. 1484–1514). De Gruyter Mouton.

Hacquard, V. (2016). Modals: Meaning Categories. In Mood, Aspect, Modality Revisited: New Answers to Old Questions (pp. 45–74). The University of Chicago Press.

Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 639–650). De Gruyter Mouton.

Kratzer, A. (2012). The Notional Category of Modaliy. In Modals and Conditionals. Oxford University Press.

Laca, B. (2014). Epistemic Modality and Temporal Anchoring. Revista Virtual de Estudos Da Linguagem, 8, 76–105.

Mûsa, F., & Hesen, V. (2023). Rêzimana Kurmancî. Saziya Zimanê Kurdî (SZK).

Öpengin, E. (2016). The Mukri Variety of Central Kurdish: Grammar, Texts, and Lexicon. Reichert Verlag.

Palmer, F. (2001). Mood and Modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford University Press.

Riemer, N. (2010). Introducing Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Stowell, T. (2004). Tense in Modals. In The Syntax of Time (pp. 621–636). The MIT Press.

Taleghani, A. H. (2008). Modality, Aspect, and Negation in Persian. John Benjamins Publishing.

Thackston, W. M. (2006). Sorani Kurdish: A Reference Grammar with Selected Readings. Harvard University Press.

Zagona, K. (2013). Tense, Aspect, and Modality. In The Oxford Handbook of Generative Syntax (pp. 746–792). Cambridge University Press.

The Modal Markers “dabe” and “dabɑ” in Mukriyani Kurdish

References

References

Volume 16, Issue 2 - Serial Number 31March 2026Pages 187-214

Volume 16, Issue 2 - Serial Number 31
March 2026
Pages 187-214