The Study of N-P-N Tripartite Exocentric Compounds in Persian: An Analysis within the Framework of Construction Morphology

Asadi, Ghazaal; Bahrami-Khorshid, Sahar; Maleki-Moghadm, Ardeshir

doi:10.22059/jolr.2021.313793.666665

The Study of N-P-N Tripartite Exocentric Compounds in Persian: An Analysis within the Framework of Construction Morphology

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Ghazaal Asadi ¹

Sahar Bahrami-Khorshid ¹

Ardeshir Maleki-Moghadm ²

¹ Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

² Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities,, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2021.313793.666665

Abstract

In many languages, compounding as a word-formation process is more productive than the other processes. According to this fact, compounding has a special role in the morphology of languages and this process has been concentrated by grammarians and linguists. Compound words of a language can be classified in various ways. In one of these classification methods, compounds are divided into two major categories: exocentric compounds and endocentric compounds. This research is an attempt to explore the N-P-N tripartite exocentric compounds of Persian within the framework of Construction Morphology. The research examines the systematic semantic relations, the possible schema of the N-P-N construction, its subschemas, and the hierarchical structure of this construction in the lexicon of Persian speakers. The data under the study have been collected from the reference book “Farhang-e Farsi-ye Āmiyāne” (Persian Slang Dictionary) written by Abolhasan Najafi which totally includes 88 tripartite compounds. The approach of this research is construction-based and tries to examine the metaphorical and semantic content of the above-mentioned compounds and to justify their word-formation pattern of them based on the concept of “construction” and “constructional schemas”. The method of this research is descriptive-analytical and the result of the research demonstrates that all the compounds that are examined in this research can be encoded by 10 semantic relations: property, person property, time, location, state, thing, condition/situation, person, action and repetition of time. Each of these semantic relations and their differences has been represented as a schema which is a pairing of form and meaning. The results also evinced that there is a direct relation between the semantic transparency of a construction and its frequency and productivity in Persian, there are 70 N-be-N compounds in the corpus which is considerably more than other types of compounds. Therefore, it is concluded that the frequency of the N-P-N compounds is rooted in their semantic transparency.

Keywords

Tripartite compound

Exocentric

Construction Morphology

Constructional schemas

N-P-N

Abassi, Z. 2017. Analyzing Complex Words in Persian in Construction Morphology and Lexical Morphology. Language Related Research Bi-monthly. no. 3, August and September of 2017: pp. 67-93. [In Persian].

Ashouri, D. 2013. A Dictionary for Human Sciences English-Persian: Revised and Added 1900 New entry. 3rd Edition. Tehran: Markaz Publication. [In Persian].

Asi, M., Badakhshan, E. 2010. Stratifying the Compound Words. Literary Text Research. Winter 2010: pp. 71-94. [In Persian].

Bamshadi, P., Ansarian, Sh. 2016. The Construction-based Approach to the Morphology and Its Application in Teaching Persian Derived and Compound Words for Persian Language Learners. The Collection of Articles from the Conference on Exploring the Sources of Teaching Persian Language to Non-Persian Speakers. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba'i University. pp. 999-1020. [In Persian].

Booij, G. E. 2007. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Morphology.2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booij, G. E. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Croft, W., Cruse, D. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dehkhoda, A. Dehkhoda Persian Dictionary. https://abadis.ir/fatofa/%D8%AA%D9%88/. [In Persian]

Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goldberg, A., 2003. Construction: A New Theoretical Approach to Language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 219-224, 6.

Goldberg, A. 2006. Construction at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, volume I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. 2013. Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Najafi, A. 2008. Persian Slang Dictionary. 2nd Edition. Tehran: Nilufar Publication. [In Persian].

Nezamabadi, A., Ghatreh, F. 2018. Investigating Multi-component Adjectives with Syntactical Input in Persian Based on Halliday's Systematic Functional Grammar. Iranian Journal of Comparative Linguistic Research. no. 15, Spring and Summer of 2018: pp. 21-34. [In Persian].

Sabzevari, M. 2012. Explaining and Analyzing the Semantic Relations in Exocentric compound nouns in Standard Persian. The Critical Studies in Text and Programs in Human Sciences, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. vol. 1, Spring and Summer of 2012: pp. 45-61. [In Persian].